Independent record. Not associated with, endorsed by or operated by Binance. We will never ask you to connect a wallet, log in or pay to recover funds.

All claims

The page states that the overlap with Bitget is small, with about $39,000 of Binance funds at the shared address against about $510,000 from Bitget, and that the thief left most of the stolen USDT unconverted for 37 minutes on Ethereum and 46 on Tron.

This line is our short summary of the quote below. The quote is the evidence.

ReportedattributionClaim 32

The overlap with Bitget is small, about $39,000 of Binance funds at the shared address against about $510,000 from Bitget, and that shows a shared laundering network, not necessarily the same hackers. The thief also left most of the stolen USDT unconverted for 37 minutes on Ethereum and 46 on Tron, where North Korean groups usually move faster.

Speaker
Not recorded
Publisher
Hacken (Analytics firm)
Original
Binance $6.3B Hack Analysis
Captured
Archived copy
sha256 2ee17a31d790
Published

Other claims from the same source

ReportedamountClaim 399

Hacken said an attacker emptied Binance hot wallets on 10 blockchains on the evening of 29 October 2026.

an attacker emptied Binance hot wallets on 10 blockchains

Speaker
Not recorded
Publisher
Hacken (Analytics firm)
Original
Binance $6.3B Hack Analysis
Captured
Archived copy
sha256 2ee17a31d790
Published
Reportedroot causeClaim 326

Hacken, quoting investigators, said the most likely explanation is that the attacker gained the ability to make Binance's hot wallet signing system sign transactions of its choosing across chains.

The most likely explanation is that the attacker gained the ability to make Binance's hot wallet signing system sign transactions of its choosing across chains.

Speaker
Not recorded
Publisher
Hacken (Analytics firm)
Original
Binance $6.3B Hack Analysis
Captured
Archived copy
sha256 2ee17a31d790
Published
Reportedroot causeClaim 325

Hacken said early signs on Ethereum pointed to phishing of the authorizations, which could explain Ethereum but none of the other chains.

Early signs on Ethereum pointed to phishing of the authorizations, which could explain Ethereum but none of the other chains.

Speaker
Not recorded
Publisher
Hacken (Analytics firm)
Original
Binance $6.3B Hack Analysis
Captured
Archived copy
sha256 2ee17a31d790
Published
ReportedotherClaim 324

Hacken recommended that wallet operators cap value and rate per wallet at the signer and hold new destinations for a second approval.

Cap value and rate per wallet at the signer and hold new destinations for a second approval

Speaker
Not recorded
Publisher
Hacken (Analytics firm)
Original
Binance $6.3B Hack Analysis
Captured
Archived copy
sha256 2ee17a31d790
Published
Reportedroot causeClaim 323

Hacken said Binance's statement that no private key leaked and investigators' view that Binance's signing system signed for the attacker can both be true.

Binance says it found no evidence that a private key leaked, while investigators say Binance's signing system signed for the attacker, and the two statements can both be true.

Speaker
Not recorded
Publisher
Hacken (Analytics firm)
Original
Binance $6.3B Hack Analysis
Captured
Archived copy
sha256 2ee17a31d790
Published