Ben-Natan said attackers may have used a compromised developer’s computer to gain access to Binance’s wallet-signing infrastructure.
Ido Ben-Natan said attackers may have used a compromised developer’s computer to gain access to Binance’s wallet-signing infrastructure.
This line is our short summary of the quote below. The quote is the evidence.
Other statements from the same source
Ido Ben-Natan warned that similar signing-system attacks threaten other exchanges and said transaction simulation could help detect malicious requests before they receive approval.
Ben-Natan warned that similar signing-system attacks threaten other exchanges and said transaction simulation could help detect malicious requests before they receive approval.
Ivo Georgiev stated that EIP 7702 is a problem because it is very poorly understood.
“This is a problem with EIP 7702, it’s just very, very poorly understood,” Georgiev said.
The speaker warned that exchange engineers might overlook the need to revoke a malicious EIP-7702 delegation after regaining control of their systems.
He said attackers could have drained the funds through other methods, but warned that exchange engineers might overlook the need to revoke a malicious EIP-7702 delegation after regaining control of their systems.
Cointelegraph quoted the speaker as saying that ultimately the signer signed a transaction that they shouldn't have.
“The takeaway is that ultimately the signer signed a transaction that they shouldn’t have,” he said.
Cointelegraph reported that Ambire CEO Ivo Georgiev said EIP-7702 made little difference because the hackers already had the ability to authorize transactions.
Ivo Georgiev, co-founder and CEO of Ethereum wallet provider Ambire, said that EIP-7702 made little difference to the attack because the hackers already had the ability to authorize transactions.