Reportedroot causeStatement 475
a compromise of signing infrastructure. We don’t think a key was leaked,” he said.
Cointelegraph quoted the speaker as describing "a compromise of signing infrastructure" and saying "We don't think a key was leaked."
This line is our short summary of the quote below. The quote is the evidence.
Cited in theories
- The Ethereum authorizations were phished: Evidence against. Blockaid's CEO: signing infrastructure compromised, key not leaked.
Other statements from the same source
ReportedattributionStatement 515
Blockaid CEO Ido Ben-Natan stated that the activity resembled operations linked to North Korea, citing Blockaid's familiarity with those attacks, but emphasized that the attribution remained unconfirmed.
Ben-Natan also said the activity resembled operations linked to North Korea, citing Blockaid’s familiarity with those attacks. He pointed to sophisticated onchain preparations but emphasized that the attribution remained unconfirmed.
ReportedattributionStatement 514
Arkham CEO Miguel Morel stated that there was insufficient information to determine whether the attack involved stolen keys or compromised infrastructure and that the hack appeared to be still ongoing.
Before Binance’s latest update, Arkham CEO Miguel Morel told Cointelegraph there was insufficient information to determine whether the attack involved stolen keys or compromised infrastructure. “From what we can tell, it appears the hack is still ongoing,” he said at the time.